Many reports by Banker
trade groups have written about check fraud over the years. Check fraud is
blight to the banking system and a threat to corporations. Specifically, 2011
check fraud statistics show how vulnerable Property Management Companies are to
check forgers. With this wide security hole, it is no wonder that check forgers
continue their criminal activities.
“Despite law enforcement’s very necessary focus on combating serious and organized financial crime, including terrorist-related activities that remain an ongoing threat – one of the simplest and most prevalent ways to commit a financial crime, to steal money, is to commit some form of check fraud.” –James H. Freis, Jr., Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), US Department of the Treasury, October 2, 2010.
Motivating Factors
“Despite law enforcement’s very necessary focus on combating serious and organized financial crime, including terrorist-related activities that remain an ongoing threat – one of the simplest and most prevalent ways to commit a financial crime, to steal money, is to commit some form of check fraud.” –James H. Freis, Jr., Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), US Department of the Treasury, October 2, 2010.
Motivating Factors
Why is there so much
check fraud? Is it the economy we are in now…..or, is it just too easy to pull
off check fraud with a laser printer and software? Every time forgers are
caught and punished, more forgers enter the scene. Many check forgery
rings are well managed, often from overseas. The masterminds of these groups
are well insulated from prosecution. Those at risk of getting caught are
usually the “runners” entering banks to cash forged checks. In many cases,
these groups try and get “ordinary” people involved in their schemes to even
further isolate themselves from discovery and prosecution.
The Findings
The Findings
In 2011 the average
Property Management Accounting Software A/P check had 4.51 security features
which on average grades a C-.The range of these security features is between
zero all the way up to 22 different security features on some checks received.
Those checks which have four or less security features are pretty much
defenseless against today’s intelligent and cunning forger.
Check Security By Accounting Software package used:
Check Security By Accounting Software package used:
Average # of Average
Software Security
Features LaserCheckGRADER.com grade
MRI 6.4 C+
QuickBooks 6.1 C
Skyline Software 3.5 D+
AMSI Software 3.4 D+
Yardi Systems 3.5 C-
The total checks received and graded at LaserCheckGRADER.com have a combined average C- grade.
As you see in the chart above, MRI Software and QuickBooks checks are fairly respectable with an average of 6 security features on their checks but only grade a C or C+. Unfortunately, Skyline Software, AMSI Software and Yardi Systems checks all are far below average with only 3.5 security features per check on average and grade rather poorly between D+ and C- at LaserCheckGRADER.com. All three of these accounting software packages with low grades have numerous vendor choices when purchasing checks. This shows that the users are not aware of the lack of security on their check stock. It is also likely that many users have not ever really even thought about the security of their checks.
Which check security feature is used the most?
The following list shows security features that Property Management Accounting Software users are implementing against check fraud.
By Security Feature:
Micro print 73%
Chemical paper 62%
Security Screen 60%
Void Pantograph 52%
Warning band 47%
Watermark 29%
Ultraviolet Fibers 29%
Laid Lines 24%
Thermo ink 22%
Prismatic 14%
Toner grip 9%
Eraser Protection 8%
High Resolution Border 4%
In Summary…..The best Check Security is Not Often Used!
This study has identified that some of the best check security features are seldom used. Property Management Accounting Software users have significant gaps with these key security features.
What really stands out on this chart is that Toner Grip is only used on 9% of the checks received. Toner Grip is such an important security feature to use against forgers. It is a special coating that allows laser toner to adhere to the paper more effectively. When counterfeiters try to lift off type with tape or a dental pick, the check paper comes with it, destroying the check and any hope of changing information on it. Toner Grip does raise production costs for the check vendor but it is a key deterrent that should be used much more often regardless of cost. Using this feature on a more widespread basis would severely limit the instances of check fraud.
Another excellent security feature with limited use is Thermochromatic Ink. This is used on only 22% of the checks received. This ink is sensitive to heat and disappears when rubbing warms the surface of the check. Thermochromatic Ink cannot be duplicated on a copy machine. The image can be captured but it will not be sensitive to the heat generated by rubbing the surface. In other words, a duplicated image loses the thermochromatic properties of the ink.
Void Pantographs were present on 52% of the checks received. This is a better showing, but only half of the checks received are using this important security feature. Many more companies could benefit from protection against their checks being scanned or photocopied.
A High Resolution Border was used on just 4% of checks received. Holograms and Foil Bars were used on a single check, well below 1%. Prismatic Printing was used on just 14% of checks received. Use of these features would significantly increase security on Property Management laser checks.
How Do Your A/P Checks Compare to this Industry Peer Group?
Yardi Systems 3.5 C-
The total checks received and graded at LaserCheckGRADER.com have a combined average C- grade.
As you see in the chart above, MRI Software and QuickBooks checks are fairly respectable with an average of 6 security features on their checks but only grade a C or C+. Unfortunately, Skyline Software, AMSI Software and Yardi Systems checks all are far below average with only 3.5 security features per check on average and grade rather poorly between D+ and C- at LaserCheckGRADER.com. All three of these accounting software packages with low grades have numerous vendor choices when purchasing checks. This shows that the users are not aware of the lack of security on their check stock. It is also likely that many users have not ever really even thought about the security of their checks.
Which check security feature is used the most?
The following list shows security features that Property Management Accounting Software users are implementing against check fraud.
By Security Feature:
Micro print 73%
Chemical paper 62%
Security Screen 60%
Void Pantograph 52%
Warning band 47%
Watermark 29%
Ultraviolet Fibers 29%
Laid Lines 24%
Thermo ink 22%
Prismatic 14%
Toner grip 9%
Eraser Protection 8%
High Resolution Border 4%
In Summary…..The best Check Security is Not Often Used!
This study has identified that some of the best check security features are seldom used. Property Management Accounting Software users have significant gaps with these key security features.
What really stands out on this chart is that Toner Grip is only used on 9% of the checks received. Toner Grip is such an important security feature to use against forgers. It is a special coating that allows laser toner to adhere to the paper more effectively. When counterfeiters try to lift off type with tape or a dental pick, the check paper comes with it, destroying the check and any hope of changing information on it. Toner Grip does raise production costs for the check vendor but it is a key deterrent that should be used much more often regardless of cost. Using this feature on a more widespread basis would severely limit the instances of check fraud.
Another excellent security feature with limited use is Thermochromatic Ink. This is used on only 22% of the checks received. This ink is sensitive to heat and disappears when rubbing warms the surface of the check. Thermochromatic Ink cannot be duplicated on a copy machine. The image can be captured but it will not be sensitive to the heat generated by rubbing the surface. In other words, a duplicated image loses the thermochromatic properties of the ink.
Void Pantographs were present on 52% of the checks received. This is a better showing, but only half of the checks received are using this important security feature. Many more companies could benefit from protection against their checks being scanned or photocopied.
A High Resolution Border was used on just 4% of checks received. Holograms and Foil Bars were used on a single check, well below 1%. Prismatic Printing was used on just 14% of checks received. Use of these features would significantly increase security on Property Management laser checks.
How Do Your A/P Checks Compare to this Industry Peer Group?
Your final step is to compare your company checks to your peers. Here are four easy steps for comparing various check and accounting software vendors based on their security features.
How to Compare Check Security FeaturesFrom Several Check Vendors
1) Perform a Google search for your Accounting Software name. Choose 3 to 5 vendors that provide checks for your accounting software in an appropriate check style.
2) Print out a list of check security features offered by each vendor.
3) Grade each vendor’s level of check security at LaserCheckGRADER.com to get a letter grade of A, B, C or D.
4) Once you have a grade for each vendor, then you can compare prices and delivery time to make a selection that is best for your company.
It really is that easy! Do this at least once every two years to stay on top of check fraud trends.
Recap
Using simple internet searches for your accounting software checks, you can often double the amount of check security without any additional cost. Once you improve your check security level, you will not need to do a threat assessment for a couple of years. This is one of the best investments of time you can make in your business this year.
This report exposes certain software packages which tend to offer less security features on their checks. This shows that the problem is not confined to a single vendor, and that we should evaluate our check software much more carefully. So it appears that there are numerous vendors which offer a low number of security features.
As a result, the best security features to protect you from check forgers are not being used nearly enough. This is true across the board.
Most companies need to focus on some basic internet research to secure their bank accounts and close the check fraud hole in their system. Starting today, it is easy to manage your check fraud risk level with some basic proactive measures.
This survey was conducted from June 1, 2011 to Dec 31, 2011. Results were compiled from actual A/P checks received from various property management companies. Every effort was made to determine which accounting software package generated the checks received. If an accounting package could not be determined, then the check was not included in the overall results and statistics. Checks that could be traced to a particular software package were used in the overall results in addition to the results for that specific software.
Property Management Accounting Software users need to be prudent and search for the highest level of check security features that their budget will allow. Shop around and do not rely on the original check source that was given at the time of your software installation. From the results above, it appears that a fraud threat assessment has never been performed at most companies. This is imperative in order to review their check quality. With an annual or semi-annual review of check security, many Property Management Companies would quickly discover that their checks are severely lacking in fraud protection and seek more secure options.
